Value Oriented Education

There is a profound Indian view about teaching whichnecessity of a greater scruple in prescribing the
declares that the first principle of teaching is thatmethods which can be considered to be distinctively
nothing can be taught. This paradoxical statement mayappropriate to this field.
seem at first sight incomprehensible. But when we lookOne speciality of the domain of values is that it is more
closely into it, we find that it contains a significantcentrally related to volition and affection, rather than to
guideline regarding the methodology of teaching. It doescognition. And yet, cognition too plays a great role in
not prohibit teaching, since it is stated to be the firstthe training of volition and affection. This point needs to
principle of teaching. It does, however, suggest that thebe underlined because of two reasons.
methods of teaching should be such that the learner isFirstly, it is sometimes assumed that value-oriented
enabled to discover by means by his own growth andeducation should be exclusively or more or less
development all that is intended to be learnt. It pointsexclusively limited to certain prescribed acts of volition
out, in other words, that the role of the teacher shouldand that the value-oriented learning should be judged
be more of a helper and a guide rather than that of anby what a learner 'does' rather than what he knows. In
instructor. This would also mean that the teacherour view, this is too simplistic and exclusive, and we
should not impose his views on the learner, but heshould avoid, the rigidity that flows from this kind of
should evoke within the learner the aspiration to learngross exclusivism.
and to find -out the truth by his own free exercise ofSecondly, and this is an opposite, view-it is sometimes
faculties.argued that learning is primarily a cognitive process
The truth behind this role of the teacher is brought outand, therefore, value-orientation learning should largely
by the contention that nothing can be taught to theor preponderantly be limited to those methods which
mind which is not already concealed as potentialare appropriate to cognition. In our view this, too, is a
knowledge in the inmost being of the learner. One isgross exclusivism which should be avoided. We
reminded of the Socratic view that knowledge isrecommend, therefore, that while methods appropriate
innate in our being but it is hidden. Socratesto, volition and affection should be more preponderant,
demonstrates in the Platonic dialogue, 'Meno', how amethods appropriate to cognition also should have a
good teacher can, without teaching, but by askinglegitimate and even an indispensable place. This is
suitable questions, bring out to the surface the truereinforced by the fact that the striving towards values
knowledge which is already unconsciously present instirs up the totality of the being and cognition no less
the learner. As we know, Socrates and Platothan volition and affection is or can be stimulated to its
distinguished between opinions, on the one hand, andhighest maximum degree, provided that the
knowledge, on the other. They point out that whereasvalue-oriented learning is allowed its natural fullness.
opinions can be formed on the basis of questionableInstruction, example and influence are the three
sense-experiences, knowledge which consists of pureinstruments of teaching. However, in our present
ideas is independent of sense-experience and can besystem of education, instruction plays an
gained by some kind of experience which is akin tooverwhelmingly important role, and often when we
remembrance. In other words, according to Socratesthink of teaching we think only of instruction. It is this
and Plato, knowledge is"remembered" by a process ofillegitimate identification that causes much confusion
uncovering.and avoidable controversies. If we examine the matter
Again, according to Socrates and Plato, virtue iscarefully, we shall find that in an ideal system of
knowledge. Therefore, what is true of knowledge isteaching, instruction should play a much less important
also true of virtue. just as knowledge cannot be taughtrole than example and influence of the teacher. It is
but can only be uncovered even so virtue, too, cannottrue that in the domain of learning where cognitive
be taught but can be uncovered. But, here again itactivities play a more dominant part, instruction through
does not mean that there is no such thing as teachinglectures and discussions may have, under certain
or that the teacher has no role to play. It only meanscircumstances, a larger role. But in those domains of
that the teacher has to be cognizant of the fact thelearning where volitional and affective activities play a
learner has in him a potentiality and that his rolelarger part, instruction through methods other than
consists of a delicate and skilful operation oflectures and discussions should play a larger role.
uncovering what is hidden or latent in the learner.In a system of education, where teaching and
There is, indeed, an opposite view, which is advocatedinstruction are almost identified, there is very little
mainly by behaviourists, who maintain that the learnerflexibility where example and influence can play their
has no hidden potentialities except some rudimentarylegitimate role. Moreover, our present system is a
capacities of reflex responses and that anything andcontinuous series of instruction punctuated by
everything can be taught to the learner by suit- ablehome-work and tests which accentuate the rigidity of
processes of conditioning which can be designedprocedure and mechanical adherence to schedule of
According to the goals in view. Thus Watson claimedtime-table syllabi and examinations. In this rigid and
that learners can be trained to become whatever youmechanical structure, the centre of attention is not the
design them to become. According to this view,child but the book, the teacher and the syllabus. The
everything can be taught, all virtues and values can bemethods which are most conducive to the
taught and cultivated by suitable methods ofdevelopment of the personality of the child such as the
conditioning.methods of self-learning, exercise of free will,
It is not our purpose to enter into a debate withindividualised pace of progress, etc., do not have even
behaviourism. But it is a fact that even behaviourisman elbow room. Indeed, if this is the system of
acknowledges that conditioning presupposes innateeducation and if we are to remain content with this
reflexes, and that the process of conditioning issystem of education, most important elements of
dependent upon a reward-punishment system which,learning will for ever remain outside this system, and
whether acknowledged or not, can be explained only ifwe cannot confidently recommend any effective
the learner has within him an innate drive towardssystem of learning, much less any effective
some kind of goal seeking and fulfilment. In otherprogramme of value-education.
words, even if we admit that external stimulation andWe envisage, however, that sooner rather than later,
conditioning are effective instruments of learning, itour system of education will change in the right
does not mean that stimulation and conditioning coulddirection. We believe that an increasing number of
work upon a subject that would be devoid of aneducationalists and teachers will come forward to
innate capacity or drive to respond.break the rigidities of our educational system. We think
Moreover, the claims of behaviourism have beenthat it is possible to make our system more and more
questioned by several rival theories of psychology. Theflexible. And we maintain that with the right type of
school of mathematical logic, for example, rejectstraining imparted to teachers, a more healthy system
behaviourism and prescribes that the aim in teachingof education will eventually be introduced and will
should be more limited and that the claims as to whatbecome effective. While on this subject, we would like
can be taught should be more modest. It maintains thatto make comment on our present system of
the aim of teaching should be to teach procedures andexaminations. Apart from a number of undesirable
not solutions and that the methods should be soaspects of our examination system, the one which is
employed that the mental processes are taken in theparticularly conducive to what may be called
direction of mathematical logic. The Gestalt psychology"anti-value" is the tendency which promotes the idea
maintains that there are in the learner basic perceptualthat passing of an examination and earning of degree
structures and schemes of behaviour which constituteis the aim of education. We recommend that radical
some kind of basic unity. It underlines, therefore, themeasures should be adopted to combat this idea and
presence of an innate intuition in the learner and itto introduce such changes in our examination system
prescribes intuitive methods based on perception,whereby the educational process can remain
which are found largely in audio-visual pedagogy.unalterably fixed on the right aims of education.
Psychoanalysis has discovered an unimaginable largeWe recommend a radical change in the examination
field of innate drives of which our activesystem as a necessary condition of any meaningful
consciousness is normally unconscious. But Freudianvalue-oriented education.
form of psychoanalysis, which posited eros and thanIt is sometimes argued that values can best be taught
as the two ultimate but conflicting innate drives in man,through the instrumentality of a number of subjects
has been largely over-passed by Adler, Jung andrather than through any specific or special subject,
others. Modern psychic research is discovering in thewhether we may call it by the name of "moral
sub-conscious a deeper layer which can properly beeducation" or "ethics", or "value-education". We feel
termed as subliminal, since it is found to be the seat ofthat there is a great force behind this contention and
innate capacities of telepathy, clairvoyance, etc. Aswe readily recommend that a well-conceived
psychology is advancing, we seem to be discoveringprogramme of studies of various subjects naturally
more and more of what is innate in the learner. At theprovide, both in their content and thrust, the requisite
same time, we, are becoming more and morematerials for value-education.
conscious of the necessity to be increasingly vigilantThe question, however, is whether our current
about the methods which we should employ in dealingprogrammes of studies have been so carefully
with the learner. It is, however, sometimes argued thatdevised as to emphasise those aspects which can
there is a valid distinction between knowledge andreadily provide to teachers and students the required
values and that while knowledge can be taught valuesopportunities, conditions and materials for value-
cannot be taught. But when we examine this vieweducation. We feel that much work remains to be
more closely,we find that what is meant is that thedone before we can give a confident answer in the
methods which are valid and appropriate in the field ofaffirmative. But even if our programmes of studies are
learning in regard to knowledge are not applicable torevised, there will still remain the specific area of value
the field of learning in regard to values. We may readilyeducation which, in our view, should receive a special,
accept this contention, and we may insist on thealthough not exclusive, attention and treatment. In other
necessity of recognising the fact that corresponding towords, we feel that there should be in the totality of
each domain of learning there are valid andeducational programmes a core programme of
appropriate methods and that the effectivity ofvalue-education. This core programme should be so
learning will depend upon an ever-vigilant discovery ofcarefully devised that various threads of this
more and more appropriate methods in each domainprogramme are woven into the complex totality of all
of learning. It is clear, for example, that while philosophythe other programmes of studies. And yet, the central
can be learnt by a process of discussion, swimmingtheme of value education would not form a mere
cannot be learnt by discussion. In order to learn toappendage of all other subjects but would stand out
swim one has to plunge into water and swim. Similarly,as the over-arching and the supervening subject of
the methods of learning music or painting have to bebasic importance.
quite different from those by which we learnWe further recommend that a suitable study of this
mathematics or physics. And indeed, when we comecore programme should form an important part of
to the realm of values, we must recognise theteachers' training programmes in our country.